EXPERT · READ, PRACTICE, REFLECT

Make a defensible release decision.

Start here when you can design a workflow and need to evaluate authority, failure, and operational risk.

Self-paced · 5 guides · No account required

Before you begin

Starting point: Experience describing workflows, evidence checks, and failure handling. Coding is optional for this design route.

Your output: An evaluation blueprint with explicit release and rollback criteria.

Read one guide, try its exercise, then explain the idea in your own words. Use fictional data while practicing.

Your reading sequence

  1. STEP 01

    Bound the system

    List tools, allowed actions, approval requirements, and stop conditions.

    Read: AI agents & permissions →
  2. STEP 02

    Inspect the evidence boundary

    Check source access, version selection, and unsupported-answer behavior.

    Read: RAG explained →
  3. STEP 03

    Define the release gate

    Separate quality dimensions and name failures that block a release.

    Read: Evaluation & risk →
  4. STEP 04

    Build the evaluation record

    Define cases, rubrics, critical gates, and the limits of your evidence.

    Read: Build an AI evaluation →
  5. STEP 05

    Review the data journey

    Map sensitive inputs, outputs, connected tools, and operational logs.

    Read: AI data privacy →

Put the ideas together

  • Prepare ten fictional evaluation cases with expected behavior.
  • Compare two candidate designs using the same rubric and cases.
  • Write a release recommendation, remaining uncertainties, monitoring owner, and rollback trigger.

Keep your first attempt and your revised version. Write a short note explaining what improved and what still needs checking.

Open the expert practice modules →

The hub contains four practice modules per level. Module progress and notes are saved in this browser; reading a guide does not mark a module complete.

SEE THE METHOD IN ACTION

The agent that passed the wrong test

Inspect an apparently strong evaluation, uncover a critical permission failure, and write a defensible release memo.

Work through the Expert case →

Check your readiness

  • I can explain why a critical failure outweighs an improved average score.
  • I can show who owns permissions, monitoring, and incident response.
  • I can justify a release decision using recorded evidence.

Use these statements as reflection prompts, not a formal score. If one feels difficult, repeat the relevant exercise with a different example.

Take the next step

After your core project, use these guides to connect the learning to an operational decision.

Respond to AI incidents →

Compare AI models fairly →

Choose your next step

Stay with this route until you can show your reasoning. You can switch levels whenever the work calls for it.

Beginner route → Practitioner route →

Look up an unfamiliar AI term →